R&D Tax Relief, Brief for Your Accountant
Editable email template to send your existing accountant proposing an R&D tax relief claim review. Frames the technical-uncertainty case in BEIS-guideline language, asks the key scheme + documentation + pre-notification questions, and keeps the engagement inside a regulated firm relationship rather than a contingent-fee R&D claim mill. DOCX, PDF, and on-page copyable text.
Last reviewed:
Guidance, not advice. We explain the rules, we don't assess your situation. Always seek financial or tax advice from your accountant, or contact HMRC. Read our editorial scope →
Free download, no signup, no email, no tracking.
What it contains
How to use it
Articulate the technical or scientific uncertainty in plain English
The single most important part is the project description. If you cannot articulate the technical or scientific uncertainty in 2 to 4 sentences, that is a signal the project may not qualify. Vague descriptions trigger HMRC enquiries.
Estimate cost scope before you send
Rough numbers are fine. Split staff time, subcontractor / EPW costs (flag UK vs overseas), and software / cloud / consumables. This lets your accountant size the claim before quoting.
Send to your existing accountant first
Keep the engagement inside a regulated firm. If R&D is not their specialism, ask for a referral to a qualified colleague via the CIOT R&D Tax Committee. Avoid contingent-fee cold-pitch R&D claim firms.
Discuss the 6 questions on a call
BEIS-guideline fit, scheme (pre-merger SME / RDEC / merged), documentation, pre-notification (first-time claimants), additional information form, fee basis. Push for fixed or hourly fees, not contingent.
Copy the letter text
Prefer not to download? Copy the text below and paste into your own document.
Subject: R&D tax relief, exploratory brief Hi [Accountant name], I would like to explore whether [Company name] has a viable R&D tax relief claim for our most recent accounting period ([period]), and ongoing claims for current + future periods. I am bringing this to you first rather than going to a cold-pitch R&D claim company, partly because I want to keep the work + the relationship within your firm, and partly because the contingent-fee R&D claim market has had a rough time with HMRC compliance challenges since the 2023 reforms (additional information form, named-officer requirement, mandatory pre-notification for first-time claimants). The project I think might qualify: [Brief description of the project, 2 to 4 sentences. What were you trying to achieve? Why was it technically or scientifically uncertain at the start? What kind of work was involved?] Why I think it may meet the R&D definition: The work involved [specific technical or scientific uncertainty] that was not readily resolvable by a competent professional in the field. We had to [specific research, experimentation, prototyping activity] to determine whether the approach would work, and several attempts failed before we reached a working solution. The project was not routine commercial work. Roughly the scope I think is in scope: - Period: [date to date] - Staff time involved: [approx FTE or hours] - Subcontractor / EPW costs: GBP [approx] (specify UK-based vs overseas; merged scheme restricts overseas-based unless R&D-not-feasible-in-UK justification) - Software, cloud, consumables: GBP [approx] Questions I would like to discuss: 1. Does the project description above plausibly meet the BEIS guidelines definition of R&D (advance in field, technological or scientific uncertainty, competent professional test)? 2. Which scheme applies, pre-merger SME or RDEC, or merged scheme from 1 April 2024? 3. What documentation should we be gathering now (technical narrative, staff time records, subcontractor invoices, cost apportionment)? 4. Do we need to pre-notify HMRC (first-time claimants must pre-notify within 6 months of period end since April 2023)? 5. What is the additional-information-form requirement + your firm's approach to preparing it? 6. Realistic fee for preparing the claim, fixed or hourly? I would prefer to avoid contingent fees. If R&D claims are not an area your firm handles directly, would you be able to refer me to a qualified colleague via CIOT R&D Tax Committee or via your firm's network? I want to keep this within a regulated firm relationship rather than going to a cold-pitch claim service. Happy to set up a call to discuss + share more detail on the technical work. Thanks, [Name] [Role], [Company] [Phone / Email] Notes for the sender (delete before sending): - The "brief description of the project" is the most important part. Vague descriptions trigger HMRC enquiries. - If you cannot articulate the technical / scientific uncertainty, that is a signal the project may not qualify. - Statute: Corporation Tax Act 2009 Part 13; Finance Act 2024 (merged scheme from 1 April 2024); Finance (No.2) Act 2023.
Related on TaxKiln
Last reviewed: