Multinational tax + tax gap → Diverted Profits Tax + 2026 reform
Diverted Profits Tax + 2026 UTPP Reform (Finance Act 2015)
Diverted Profits Tax was introduced by Finance Act 2015 (the so-called 'Google Tax') to address two perceived gaps in the corporate tax framework: foreign companies avoiding a UK permanent establishment despite significant UK activity; and arrangements between connected parties that lack economic substance and reduce UK Corporation Tax. The rate was set higher than CT (originally 25%, raised to 31% from April 2023) deliberately, to incentivise multinationals to settle by paying CT rather than DPT. From 2026 the regime is being substantially restructured: DPT is being replaced by an Unassessed Transfer Pricing Profits (UTPP) Charge integrated into the transfer pricing framework, simplifying the dual-regime overlap that has caused practitioner friction since 2015. Published case law on DPT is limited because most cases settle pre-litigation.
Last reviewed:
Guidance, not advice. We explain the rules, we don't assess your situation. Always seek financial or tax advice from your accountant, or contact HMRC. Read our editorial scope →
In plain English
DPT was designed to do two things: deter structures and create a settlement lever. The deterrence works by making non-compliance more expensive than compliance. DPT at 31% is higher than CT at 25% — a multinational facing a DPT assessment has incentive to settle by paying CT (lower rate, deductible under treaties) rather than fighting DPT (higher rate, treaty position contested). The settlement lever works through the notification + charging notice mechanism. The taxpayer must notify HMRC if DPT might apply within 3 months of period-end. HMRC then has 24 months to issue a preliminary notice + charging notice. The taxpayer must pay DPT within 30 days of charging notice (then dispute) — pay first, argue later. This 'pay-up-front' mechanism is what makes DPT economically powerful. The 2026 reform integrates DPT into transfer pricing, ending the dual-regime overlap. The new Unassessed Transfer Pricing Profits Charge is intended to be more practitioner-friendly while preserving HMRC's settlement leverage. Watch the Finance Bill for detail.
How it works
Charge 1: Avoided UK PE
Applies where a foreign company has significant UK activity (typically UK sales personnel) but no formal UK PE, AND the arrangements were designed to avoid a UK PE, AND the tax benefit is more than incidental. Targets pre-2015 'Limited Risk Distributor' and 'Commissionaire' structures.
Charge 2: Entities lacking economic substance
Applies to transactions between connected parties (typically UK Co + foreign affiliate) where the arrangement lacks economic substance AND reduces UK CT AND the tax benefit is more than incidental. Effectively a transfer-pricing backstop with bite.
Notification
Taxpayer must notify HMRC within 3 months of end of accounting period if DPT might apply. Failure to notify carries separate penalty regime (Sch 16 FA 2015 + Sch 24 FA 2007). 'Might apply' is interpreted broadly — many groups notify defensively.
Charging mechanism + pay-up-front
HMRC issues preliminary notice → charging notice within 24 months. Taxpayer pays DPT within 30 days of charging notice. Review period: 12 months. After review period, taxpayer can appeal to FTT — but DPT remains paid throughout dispute. Pay first, argue later.
2026 UTPP reform
DPT to be restructured as Unassessed Transfer Pricing Profits Charge — integrated into the transfer pricing framework rather than a separate regime. Removes the dual-regime overlap that has caused practitioner friction. Preserves the pay-up-front settlement lever in revised form. Watch Finance Bill drafting.
Who this applies to + key conditions
- Foreign companies with significant UK activity but no formal UK PE
- Multinational groups with UK-affiliate transactions reducing UK CT
- SME exception: groups with <250 employees AND turnover <€50m or balance sheet <€43m generally excluded
- De minimis threshold: arrangements with UK tax benefit <£10m typically not pursued
Statute + manual references
Primary: Finance Act 2015 Part 3 + Schedule 16 — Diverted Profits Tax.
Related: Finance Act 2022 + Finance Act 2023 — DPT rate increases and refinements; TIOPA 2010 Part 4 — transfer pricing (interaction); TIOPA 2010 Part 9A — CFC rules (interaction); 2026 Finance Bill — Unassessed Transfer Pricing Profits Charge
HMRC manual: INTM489000+ (International Manual — DPT)
Common mistakes + traps
- Treating DPT as a profits tax computed like CT — DPT has its own computational rules in Sch 16 FA 2015
- Forgetting the notification obligation — 3-month deadline carries penalty risk
- Assuming DPT can be challenged before payment — pay-up-front rule applies
- Assuming DPT settles by treaty — treaty position is contested by some counterparties
- Believing SME exception requires only one threshold — both employee + turnover/balance sheet conditions apply
Worked example
Group Y — US tech company with UK sales operation, pre-2015 structure
Group Y has 200 UK sales staff who pitch and close deals with UK customers. Contracts are signed by Ireland-resident sales director. UK Co is engaged as a 'limited risk service provider' earning cost+5%. UK CT bill on the cost+5% margin is £2m. Ireland books £100m profit on UK-customer revenue.
- Step 1 — UK sales activity is substantial, but no formal UK PE (contracts signed in Ireland).
- Step 2 — DPT Charge 1 (avoided PE) applies if arrangements were designed to avoid PE + tax benefit > incidental.
- Step 3 — HMRC issues notification request, then preliminary notice estimating UK profit if Ireland-routing were unwound (~£25m UK profit attributable to UK sales activity).
- Step 4 — DPT @ 31% on the £25m would be £7.75m.
- Step 5 — Group Y can either (a) restructure to formal UK PE and pay CT @ 25% on the £25m (£6.25m), or (b) accept DPT charge (£7.75m). Settlement at CT is cheaper.
- Step 6 — Group Y restructures: UK Co becomes formal PE, books £25m UK profit, pays CT £6.25m. DPT settlement leverage achieved.
Outcome: DPT functions exactly as designed: deterrent and settlement lever rather than primary revenue source. Group Y now pays CT on UK economic activity at standard rate. Yield for HMRC: indirect via CT rather than direct DPT collection.
How this connects to the rest of the framework
DPT is a backstop to transfer pricing; 2026 UTPP reform integrates the two regimes.
Pillar Two and DPT both address profit-shifting but via different mechanisms (jurisdictional ETR vs UK-specific charge).
DPT was nicknamed 'Google Tax' — directly motivated by the famous cases corridor.
DPT is one of the UK's earliest BEPS-aligned unilateral measures.
Frequently asked questions
What happens if I miss the Self Assessment deadline?+
Do I need an accountant or can I file Self Assessment myself?+
How do payments on account work?+
How much does DPT actually collect?+
Why is published DPT case law so limited?+
Will the 2026 UTPP reform reduce HMRC's leverage?+
Free + regulated-body resources
- HMRC INTM489000+ (DPT) →
Definitive DPT authority
- Finance Act 2015 Part 3 + Sch 16 →
Statutory text
- CIOT DPT technical commentary →
Practitioner commentary
Last reviewed: